Compare Fonts

Compare FontsSans Serif → Arimo vs Roboto Flex

Arimo vs Roboto Flex

Both are sans serif faces on Google Fonts. Arimo has the larger x-height, so it looks bigger at the same size. Roboto Flex takes more horizontal space.

Arimo

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Roboto Flex

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Measured differences

Measured from the font files. Heights and widths are shown as a share of the font size, so they compare directly at any point size.
MeasurementArimoRoboto FlexDifference
x-heightHeight of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size.52.8%51.4%1.5%
Cap heightHeight of capitals, as a share of the font size.68.8%71.1%2.3%
x-height to cap ratioProportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open.0.770.720.05
Stroke weightMeasured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page.9.2%9.3%0.1%
Stroke contrastHorizontal stroke divided by vertical. 1.0 is even; below 0.5 means strong thick-thin modulation.0.700.800.10
Average character widthMean lowercase advance. Higher takes more horizontal space.48.9%49.5%0.5%

Where they diverge most

At a glance

  Arimo Roboto Flex
Category Sans Serif Sans Serif
Weights 4 10
Variable axes 1 13
Language subsets 8 6
Designer Steve Matteson Font Bureau

See fonts similar to Arimo or fonts similar to Roboto Flex.