Compare Fonts

Compare FontsSans Serif → Figtree vs Red Hat Display

Figtree vs Red Hat Display

Both are sans serif faces on Google Fonts. Red Hat Display has the larger x-height, so it looks bigger at the same size. Figtree takes more horizontal space.

Figtree

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Red Hat Display

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Measured differences

Measured from the font files. Heights and widths are shown as a share of the font size, so they compare directly at any point size.
MeasurementFigtreeRed Hat DisplayDifference
x-heightHeight of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size.50.0%50.1%0.1%
Cap heightHeight of capitals, as a share of the font size.70.0%70.0%0.0%
x-height to cap ratioProportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open.0.710.720.00
Stroke weightMeasured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page.8.1%7.3%0.8%
Stroke contrastHorizontal stroke divided by vertical. 1.0 is even; below 0.5 means strong thick-thin modulation.0.910.900.01
Average character widthMean lowercase advance. Higher takes more horizontal space.50.7%49.8%0.9%

Where they diverge most

At a glance

  Figtree Red Hat Display
Category Sans Serif Sans Serif
Weights 7 7
Variable axes 1 1
Language subsets 2 2
Designer Erik Kennedy MCKL

See fonts similar to Figtree or fonts similar to Red Hat Display.