Compare Fonts

Compare FontsSans Serif → Lato vs Roboto Flex

Lato vs Roboto Flex

Both are sans serif faces on Google Fonts. Roboto Flex has the larger x-height, so it looks bigger at the same size. Lato takes more horizontal space.

Lato

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Roboto Flex

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Measured differences

Measured from the font files. Heights and widths are shown as a share of the font size, so they compare directly at any point size.
MeasurementLatoRoboto FlexDifference
x-heightHeight of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size.50.6%51.4%0.7%
Cap heightHeight of capitals, as a share of the font size.71.7%71.1%0.6%
x-height to cap ratioProportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open.0.710.720.02
Stroke weightMeasured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page.9.2%9.3%0.1%
Stroke contrastHorizontal stroke divided by vertical. 1.0 is even; below 0.5 means strong thick-thin modulation.0.760.800.04
Average character widthMean lowercase advance. Higher takes more horizontal space.49.5%49.5%0.1%

Where they diverge most

At a glance

  Lato Roboto Flex
Category Sans Serif Sans Serif
Weights 5 10
Variable axes None 13
Language subsets 2 6
Designer Łukasz Dziedzic Font Bureau

See fonts similar to Lato or fonts similar to Roboto Flex.