Compare Fonts

Compare FontsSans Serif → Roboto Condensed vs Oswald

Roboto Condensed vs Oswald

Both are sans serif faces on Google Fonts. Oswald has the larger x-height, so it looks bigger at the same size. Roboto Condensed takes more horizontal space.

Roboto Condensed

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Oswald

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Measured differences

Measured from the font files. Heights and widths are shown as a share of the font size, so they compare directly at any point size.
MeasurementRoboto CondensedOswaldDifference
x-heightHeight of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size.52.8%57.8%5.0%
Cap heightHeight of capitals, as a share of the font size.71.1%81.0%9.9%
x-height to cap ratioProportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open.0.740.710.03
Stroke weightMeasured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page.8.6%10.7%2.1%
Stroke contrastHorizontal stroke divided by vertical. 1.0 is even; below 0.5 means strong thick-thin modulation.0.860.740.12
Average character widthMean lowercase advance. Higher takes more horizontal space.44.1%40.0%4.1%

Where they diverge most

At a glance

  Roboto Condensed Oswald
Category Sans Serif Sans Serif
Weights 9 6
Variable axes 1 1
Language subsets 7 5
Designer Christian Robertson Vernon Adams

See fonts similar to Roboto Condensed or fonts similar to Oswald.