Compare Fonts

Compare FontsMonospace → Roboto Mono vs Space Mono

Roboto Mono vs Space Mono

Both are monospace faces on Google Fonts. Roboto Mono has the larger x-height, so it looks bigger at the same size. Space Mono takes more horizontal space.

Roboto Mono

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Space Mono

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys

The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.

Measured differences

Measured from the font files. Heights and widths are shown as a share of the font size, so they compare directly at any point size.
MeasurementRoboto MonoSpace MonoDifference
x-heightHeight of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size.52.8%49.6%3.2%
Cap heightHeight of capitals, as a share of the font size.71.1%70.0%1.1%
x-height to cap ratioProportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open.0.740.710.03
Stroke weightMeasured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page.9.0%8.0%1.0%
Stroke contrastHorizontal stroke divided by vertical. 1.0 is even; below 0.5 means strong thick-thin modulation.0.820.930.11
Average character widthMean lowercase advance. Higher takes more horizontal space.60.0%61.2%1.2%

Where they diverge most

At a glance

  Roboto Mono Space Mono
Category Monospace Monospace
Weights 7 2
Variable axes 1 None
Language subsets 6 3
Designer Christian Robertson Colophon Foundry

See fonts similar to Roboto Mono or fonts similar to Space Mono.