Compare Fonts → Sans Serif → Roboto vs Asap
Roboto vs Asap
Both are sans serif faces on Google Fonts. Roboto has the larger x-height, so it looks bigger at the same size. Roboto takes more horizontal space.
Roboto
Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys
Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.
Asap
Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys
Handgloves & Quartz Jockeys
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs, then ship it to 1,842 Grove Street by 9:30 AM.
Measured differences
| Measurement | Roboto | Asap | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| x-heightHeight of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size. | 52.8% | 52.3% | 0.5% |
| Cap heightHeight of capitals, as a share of the font size. | 71.1% | 70.0% | 1.1% |
| x-height to cap ratioProportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open. | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
| Stroke weightMeasured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page. | 9.1% | 8.8% | 0.3% |
| Stroke contrastHorizontal stroke divided by vertical. 1.0 is even; below 0.5 means strong thick-thin modulation. | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.00 |
| Average character widthMean lowercase advance. Higher takes more horizontal space. | 49.9% | 49.9% | 0.0% |
Where they diverge most
- x-height: Roboto measures 52.8%, Asap measures 52.3%. Height of lowercase letters, as a share of the font size. Higher reads larger at the same point size.
- Stroke weight: Roboto measures 9.1%, Asap measures 8.8%. Measured thickness of a vertical stroke. Higher is heavier on the page.
- x-height to cap ratio: Roboto measures 0.74, Asap measures 0.75. Proportion of lowercase to uppercase. Higher feels more modern and open.
At a glance
| Roboto | Asap | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans Serif | Sans Serif |
| Weights | 9 | 9 |
| Variable axes | 2 | 2 |
| Language subsets | 9 | 3 |
| Designer | Christian Robertson | Omnibus-Type |